GO runs perfect same with Diablo 3 BF3 and while i play those games im streaming live, downloading torrents, encoding blurays, web surfing. Llano, IPC is not the primary goal I think. The retail package comes with a pretty hefty heatsink and fan combination that should be able to handle the extra thermal load that the watt CPU provides. I had originally planned on making a budget computer with this proc at the center of it. Any Condition Any Condition. AMD is in trouble, but its troubles are far more than little old me giving the FX an honest review. Probably not really worth the effort since Bulldozer is in full production, and is finally yielding good enough to meet demand.
|Date Added:||21 December 2012|
|File Size:||45.42 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If it plays the games you want it to play or encode faster than your last rig, then you did alright! Any Condition Any Condition. I have a with a x sli and have had absolutely no issues with gaming at ultra with dual 52” led tvs.
Reliable Easy install Verified purchase: Also, going back to die size, the FX and FX dwarf the smaller, cooler, and more efficient Intel products.
April 12, The introduction of the first Llano products did not help things. April 11, Benchmarks yes they do show performace this and that but get youre hands on it and really test it fs6200 and you will fall inlove.
I’m not very sure the automatic design has anything to do with the lack of performance. AMD came along with the Athlon and suddenly we were pushing MHz to 1 GHz in that time frame with much more aggressive parts and pricing from Intel. Improvements came at last.
Skip to main content. So to conclude my little analysis I would say that even using manual routing the CPU would still have flopped due to starved cores, undersized schedulers and FPU, these are all design decisions.
On the iGPU side AMD Ryzen X 3. That is going to fxx6200 very good for notebooks and ultra-thins. At that point the FX product pulls more watts at the wall than the T it barely outpaces.
Even though the processor had a maximum Turbo Core of 3. Well, at least in the case of Trinity vs.
AMD FX-6200 3.8 GHz Six Core (FD6200FRGUBOX) Processor
Early last year when we saw the performance of the low power Bobcat architecture, we thought would be a breakout year for AMD. Spend the difference on a better gfx card fx620 stronger case.
That is not good for AMD, and it is certainly not good for customers. That is light-years ahead of last gen.
Trending Price New. It maybe worth it.
AMD Black Edition AMD FX / GHz processor Specs – CNET
To compensate for the poor clock-for-clock performance! Yes, it certainly is interesting to see that AMD is at nearly the same place as Intel was with the jump from Northwood fx66200 Prescott.
I agree with you, AMD needs support and people buying their products. On the other hand if the new parts you were betting on aren’t up to par, maybe they should think about re-releasing successful architectures, ALONG with the new ones.
Intel Core i – 3. This item doesn’t belong on this page.
PassMark – AMD FX Six-Core – Price performance comparison
I have not heard of Vishera, is that another entirely new architecture or based off Bulldozer or Piledriver? Still, there was hope that these products could more than hold its own against the i3 and i5 in the same price range. AMD Ryzen 7 X 3.